Post by account_disabled on Feb 13, 2024 22:10:10 GMT -8
The by actual experts say medical doctors or if it was written by medical students or laypeople or somebody else. It can do that for any type of site whether its medical law finance and classify its expertise. In this sense what Google is saying if Google wants sites within the medical sphere to be like the Mayo Clinic and they are rewarding sites that are like the Mayo Clinic that is really hard to fix and its almost impossible to fake with these kinds of sophisticated algorithms. So its very hard to give.
SEO recommendations based on something like this. What you really have Congo Email List to do if you want to dive in is start finding where the differences are between your site and those sites that are actually ranking. Marie Haynes another SEO who thinks a lot about EAT she says in an interview with Aleyda Solis that Im also going to link to its an excellent video. Thank you Aleyda for doing that. She says its about finding the gaps. But back to Lily Ray. Im getting sidetracked here. Lily Ray is one of the few SEOs who has actually done really good research into EAT by comparing sites and seeing what some of the differences are of sites that have been rewarded and sites that have fallen in rankings.
Some of her research has found some really interesting things. For example for medical queries sites that lost had more theyre selling something theyre trying to sign you up a little bit of mixed intent. Where the expert sites had fewer CTAs. The winning sites were written more by real experts as opposed to laypeople or people without advanced degrees. The losing sites had fewer affiliate links and that could be something like this algorithm at work or something like that. But we start to identify whats actually being rewarded. Again this is hard.
SEO recommendations based on something like this. What you really have Congo Email List to do if you want to dive in is start finding where the differences are between your site and those sites that are actually ranking. Marie Haynes another SEO who thinks a lot about EAT she says in an interview with Aleyda Solis that Im also going to link to its an excellent video. Thank you Aleyda for doing that. She says its about finding the gaps. But back to Lily Ray. Im getting sidetracked here. Lily Ray is one of the few SEOs who has actually done really good research into EAT by comparing sites and seeing what some of the differences are of sites that have been rewarded and sites that have fallen in rankings.
Some of her research has found some really interesting things. For example for medical queries sites that lost had more theyre selling something theyre trying to sign you up a little bit of mixed intent. Where the expert sites had fewer CTAs. The winning sites were written more by real experts as opposed to laypeople or people without advanced degrees. The losing sites had fewer affiliate links and that could be something like this algorithm at work or something like that. But we start to identify whats actually being rewarded. Again this is hard.