Post by xyz3800 on Feb 27, 2024 22:26:15 GMT -8
Consumers who were harmed by the compulsory contracting of Caixa's brokerage services when purchasing properties through direct sales, between 2005 and 2008, can request, from the Federal Court, the refund of amounts unduly charged. The bank and the Regional Council of Real Estate Brokers of Paraná (Creci-PR) were condemned in the first instance, which considered the charge to be illegal. The decision was upheld by the Federal Regional Court of the 4th Region, which ordered the execution of the sentence. 123RF The amounts refunded to consumers will be corrected in accordance with the National Consumer Price Index (INPC) and added with late payment interest, counted from the date of summons to the defendants.
The decision was made in a public civil action filed by the Federal Public Ministry in Paraná against the obligation imposed by the bank in adhesion contracts for the sale of property by direct sale. At the time, Caixa conditioned the sale of its properties on contracting Creci-PR, leaving the burden of brokerage on consumers. Direct sale To sell properties repossessed due to contractual default by borrowers of Exit Mobile Number List the Housing Finance System, Caixa sends the assets it owns to auction, under the form of public competition (Law 8,666/93). If there are no interested parties, the sale is made through the direct sale of the property to the first interested party who appears with a proposal of equal value or greater than the minimum value established in the Notice.
However, to complete this direct sale, Caixa, through an agreement with Creci-PR, required consumers interested in purchasing properties to pay fees to the council, through the intermediation of a real estate broker accredited by it. The broker, then, was remunerated by the equivalent of 5% of the value of the property, at the buyer's expense, as provided for in standardized clauses contained in the public tender notices issued by Caixa. With information from the MPF-PR Press Office.The agreement with Odebrecht dates back to December. Therefore, it is older than the one with Petrobras, signed in September 2018 and announced in January of this year. But many of the elements that raised suspicions about the intentions of the "Lava Jato" prosecutors with their anti-corruption crusade were already there — and had gone unnoticed.
The decision was made in a public civil action filed by the Federal Public Ministry in Paraná against the obligation imposed by the bank in adhesion contracts for the sale of property by direct sale. At the time, Caixa conditioned the sale of its properties on contracting Creci-PR, leaving the burden of brokerage on consumers. Direct sale To sell properties repossessed due to contractual default by borrowers of Exit Mobile Number List the Housing Finance System, Caixa sends the assets it owns to auction, under the form of public competition (Law 8,666/93). If there are no interested parties, the sale is made through the direct sale of the property to the first interested party who appears with a proposal of equal value or greater than the minimum value established in the Notice.
However, to complete this direct sale, Caixa, through an agreement with Creci-PR, required consumers interested in purchasing properties to pay fees to the council, through the intermediation of a real estate broker accredited by it. The broker, then, was remunerated by the equivalent of 5% of the value of the property, at the buyer's expense, as provided for in standardized clauses contained in the public tender notices issued by Caixa. With information from the MPF-PR Press Office.The agreement with Odebrecht dates back to December. Therefore, it is older than the one with Petrobras, signed in September 2018 and announced in January of this year. But many of the elements that raised suspicions about the intentions of the "Lava Jato" prosecutors with their anti-corruption crusade were already there — and had gone unnoticed.