Post by account_disabled on Feb 13, 2024 22:09:36 GMT -8
The instead they used machine learning. Again to grossly oversimplify Britney Muller has a great post on machine learning. Im going to link to it if youre interested. But what they did is they took sites that they wanted to see more of in Google search results sites like New York Times things like that that based on certain qualifications like did they think the site was welldesigned would you trust it with your credit card does it seem like its updated regularly and written by authors and they put these in a bucket. Instead of giving the algorithm direct signals they told the machine learning program.
Find us more sites like this. We want to reward these sites. that are Saudi Arabia Email List modeled or rewarded. People in this school of thought say Lets just go after the same thing Googlers are going after because we know those things tend to work. Algorithms that fall in this bucket are like Panda site quality and EAT. In this school of thought yes EAT can be considered a ranking factor. . Level Any quality or action direct or indirect effects Then theres even a third school of thought that goes further than these two and this school of thought says any quality or action that could increase rankings should be considered a ranking factor even if.
Google doesnt use it in its algorithm direct or indirect. An example of this might be social media shares. We know that Google does not use social media shares directly in its algorithm. But getting your content out in front of a large number of people can lead to links and shares and eventually more traffic and rankings as those signals roll downhill. Now it may seem kind of crazy to think that anyone would consider something a ranking factor if Google actually didnt consider it a ranking factor directly in its algorithms. But if.
Find us more sites like this. We want to reward these sites. that are Saudi Arabia Email List modeled or rewarded. People in this school of thought say Lets just go after the same thing Googlers are going after because we know those things tend to work. Algorithms that fall in this bucket are like Panda site quality and EAT. In this school of thought yes EAT can be considered a ranking factor. . Level Any quality or action direct or indirect effects Then theres even a third school of thought that goes further than these two and this school of thought says any quality or action that could increase rankings should be considered a ranking factor even if.
Google doesnt use it in its algorithm direct or indirect. An example of this might be social media shares. We know that Google does not use social media shares directly in its algorithm. But getting your content out in front of a large number of people can lead to links and shares and eventually more traffic and rankings as those signals roll downhill. Now it may seem kind of crazy to think that anyone would consider something a ranking factor if Google actually didnt consider it a ranking factor directly in its algorithms. But if.